The NCE is essentially an authority responsible for keeping everything together. It develops and maintains the cooperation agreement, approves and controls the QHIN and adapts the technical framework when needed. People who do not wish to share their information can express their desire that their data not be transmitted through the network, rancourt said, noting that “the applicable law” applies to privacy. The ONC has allocated approximately $1.1 million per year to our cooperation agreement with the Sequoia Project, the recognized coordinating body (CEN), to support the implementation of the TEFCA. As part of the cooperation agreement, the NCE is responsible for the development, updating, implementation and maintenance of the common agreement and technical framework of the Qualified Health Information Network (QTF). These funds will be used to support NCE`s activities from August 2020 to August 2021. Learn more about this announcement. Let`s go through the entities that play a role in the proposed agreement architecture. In the Cures Act, ONC is responsible for creating or selecting a TEFCA to allow exchanges on different networks.
In the new ONC project, the stated objectives for TEFCA are the objectives: TEFCA provides a framework for the exchange of patient information that is absolutely necessary for our sector to improve our ability to fill our data silos. The goals that have pushed TEFCA to this point are good, but the road ahead will not be easy. In general, the goal is “more data where it is needed.” While this may be helpful, many of us know that more is not necessarily better. For TEFCA`s objectives to be achieved, there is still an ugly barrier. This problem is the quality of the data we have and that we share. Until we better control the quality of our data in each participant, we have the inherent risk of sharing a virus instead of a cure. If you look at our schoober analogy, you want to make sure your student has been vaccinated properly before sending him to school to avoid a measles outbreak. To address this issue, I think we need to think about how to improve the quality of the information we share.
I don`t want to sound pessimistic. I think the TEFCA is a big step in the right direction. All we need to know is that we may not get the results we expect until we address the data quality issue. If we don`t get these results at first, we should resist the urge to throw the baby out with the bathwater. If we break the data quality barrier, we will be much better off with something like LEFCA. There are six common principles that are at the heart of the Trusted Exchange Framework (TEF). Both TEFCA and the proposed information-blocking rules will require existing HIN and LES to make changes to their existing data usage and policy agreements to ensure compliance. Participation in the TEFCA is voluntary, so that HIN and HEIs who wish to participate actively take into account the areas in which the two requirements intersect when updating their existing agreements. It will also be important to monitor and take into account the timeliness of implementation of the information blocking and the TEFCA.
The NCE and each QHIN would reach a common agreement. With NCE, which provides supervision of the framework. Ensure that operational activities comply with ONC requirements. The agreement would include several “top-down flow” clauses. These apply to QHIN agreements with participants or participants. Each level of the structure would operate in accordance with the six TEF principles. There are plans to develop a framework that will reduce the need for so many electronic exchange methods for stakeholders.